November 4, 2011

So what's this talk about AQ's, Pool B and Pool C?

By Christan Shirk

On the threshhold of the men's and women's NCAA tournaments, terms like AQ's, Pool B, and Pool C are being used by those in-the-know and perhaps leaving new fans and the uninitiated a little lost and confused.  For those in the former group, what follows may largely be unnecessary, although the breakdown of the number of Pool B and Pool C berths for 2011 may be new information.  For the latter group, this article will explain this terminology and walk you through the process by which NCAA tournament participants are determined.

All information about the determination of tournament participants is found in the Division III Soccer Pre-Championship Manual, which can be linked to from the NCAA Division III Men's and Women's Soccer Administration pages.  Much of what follows highlights, summarizes, or quotes the manual.  The tournament format, schedule, and bracketing of teams will not be covered here, but that is covered in our introduction to the 2011 NCAA DIII Soccer Championships here.   

Most conferences receive a single automatic berth to the men's and women's tournaments which they may award in the manner they see fit, usually to their conference champions.  The remainder of each tournament field is made up of at-large selections made by the Division III men's and women's soccer committees following a prescribed set of criteria.  Read on to discover the size of the tournament fields, how many and which conferences receive automatic berths, and how many at-large berths are available and on what basis they are awarded.

Administration / Selection Committees

The NCAA championship tournaments are administrated by the eight-member NCAA Division III Men's and Women's Soccer Committees which are each composed of the chairs of their respective regional advisory committees.  These committees make the at-large selections to complete the tournament field, assisted in the evaluation of teams by the Regional Advisory Committees.  These are the same national and regional committees which release the pre-tournament weekly NCAA Regional Rankings.  The members of these committees can be found on pages 10-14 of the Pre-Championship Manual.

Tournament Field Size

The maximum size of the single-elimination men's and women's tournament fields is established by the Division III Championships Committee which currently prescribes an approximate access ratio of 1:6.5 not to exceed 64 participants, as per Article 31.3.1.1 of the 2011-12 NCAA Division III Manual (pg. 214).  Based on the number of championship eligible teams last year (2010), the men's and women's committees have gained approval for 61- and 64-team tournaments in 2011, as per the Pre-Championship Manual (pg. 17).

2011 Tournament Field Sizes


2010 Eligibility / Access Ratio Field Size
Men 396 eligible teams / 6.5 = 60.9 61 teams
Women 415 eligible teams / 6.5 = 63.8 64 teams

Types of Tournament Berths

Teams eligible for the championship tournament are divided into three pools: Pool A, Pool B, and Pool C, as per Section 2.3 of the Pre-Championship Manual (pg. 20).

Classification of championship-eligible teams

  • Pool A - conference selected representatives, one from each conference that meets the requirements for automatic qualification
  • Pool B - independent institutions and institutions that are members of conferences that do not meet the requirements for automatic qualification
  • Pool C - institutions from automatic-qualifying conferences that are not their conference champion and the remaining teams in Pool B

Pool A berths are automatic, based on pre-definied criteria set by each qualifying conference for how they will award their automatic berth.  Often the berth is awarded to the conference champion, whether determined by regular season finish or by a post-season tournament.  However, some conferences determine their champion by regular season finish and hold a post-season tournament to award the automatic berth.  AQ is the common short-hand for automatic qualifiers or Pool A berths.  (Note: our 2011 Conference Tournament Central page indicates whether each tournament determines the conference champion, AQ berth, or both, and includes a table of AQ winners.)

Berths given to teams from Pools B and C are at-large berths.  The recipients are selected by the NCAA men's and women's committees following a set of selection citeria and priniciples discussed in more detail below.   

Allocation of Berths

Forty-one (41) men's conferences and forty-two (42) women's conferences have been granted automatic qualification (AQ) for the 2011 championship tournaments.  Those conferences are listed on pages 21-23 of the Pre-Championship Manual and in the section below.

The number of at-large Pool B berths is determined by applying an access ratio up to but not to exceed that of Pool A teams.  The Pool A access ratio is the total number of eligible teams in AQ conferences divided by the number of  AQ conferences.  When this ratio is applied to Pool B, the result is traditionally rounded down to the nearest whole number to ensure that Pool B access ratio does not exceed that of Pool A.  

The number of at-large Pool C berths is simply the number of remaining tournament spots after the Pool A and B berths have been filled. 

According to Section 2.3 of the Pre-Championship Manual (pg. 21), the tournament berth allocations for 2011 break down as follows for the men's and women's championships.

2011 Allocation of Berths

Men's Tournament
Pool A No. of Automatic Qualifying Conferences 41 berths
Pool B No. of Pool B teams / Pool A access ratio
13 / (383/41) = 13 / 9.34 = 1.4
1 berth  
Pool C Field size - Pool A berths - Pool B berths
61 - 41 - 1 = 19
19 berths
Women's Tournament
Pool A No. of Automatic Qualifying Conferences 42 berths
Pool B No. of Pool B teams / Pool A access ratio
13 / (406/42) = 13 / 9.67 = 1.3
1 berth  
Pool C Field size - Pool A berths - Pool B berths
64 - 42 - 1 = 21
21 berths

Automatic Qualifying (AQ) Conferences

As per Section 2.3 of the Pre-Championship Manual (pgs. 21-22), the following conferences have been granted automatic qualification (AQ) for the 2011 championship from Pool A.

Men's AQ Conferences (41)

Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference (AMCC)

American Southwest Conference (ASC)

Capital Athletic Conference (CAC)

Centennial Conference

City University of New York Athletic Conference (CUNYAC)

College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin (CCIW)

Colonial States Athletic Conference (CSAC)

The Commonwealth Coast Conference(CCC)

Commonwealth Conference

Empire 8

Freedom Conference

Great Northeast Athletic Conference (GNAC)

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference (HCAC)

Iowa Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (IIAC)

Landmark Conference

Liberty League

Little East Conference (LEC)

Massachusetts State College Athletic Conference (MASCAC)

Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association (MIAA)

Midwest Conference (MWC)

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (MIAC)

New England Collegiate Conference (NECC)

New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC)

New England Women’s and Men’s Athletic Conference (NEWMAC)

New Jersey Athletic Conference (NJAC)

North Atlantic Conference (NAC)

North Coast Athletic Conference (NCAC)

North Eastern Athletic Conference (NEAC)

Northern Athletics Conference

Northwest Conference (NWC)

Ohio Athletic Conference (OAC)

Old Dominion Athletic Conference (ODAC)

President’s Athletic Conference (PAC)

Skyline Conference

St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SLIAC)

Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SCIAC)

Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference (SCAC)

State University of New York Athletic Conference (SUNYAC)

University Athletic Association (UAA)

Upper Midwest Athletic Conference (UMAC)

USA South Athletic Conference

 

Women's AQ Conferences (42)

Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference (AMCC)

American Southwest Conference (ASC)

Capital Athletic Conference (CAC)

Centennial Conference

College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin (CCIW)

Colonial States Athletic Conference (CSAC)

The Commonwealth Coast Conference(CCC)

Commonwealth Conference

Empire 8

Freedom Conference

Great Northeast Athletic Conference (GNAC)

Great South Athletic Conference

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference (HCAC)

Iowa Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (IIAC)

Landmark Conference

Liberty League

Little East Conference (LEC)

Massachusetts State College Athletic Conference (MASCAC)

Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association (MIAA)

Midwest Conference (MWC)

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (MIAC)

New England Collegiate Conference (NECC)

New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC)

New England Women’s and Men’s Athletic Conference (NEWMAC)

New Jersey Athletic Conference (NJAC)

North Atlantic Conference (NAC)

North Coast Athletic Conference (NCAC)

North Eastern Athletic Conference (NEAC)

Northern Athletics Conference

Northwest Conference (NWC)

Ohio Athletic Conference (OAC)

Old Dominion Athletic Conference (ODAC)

President’s Athletic Conference (PAC)

Skyline Conference

St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SLIAC)

Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SCIAC)

Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference (SCAC)

State University of New York Athletic Conference (SUNYAC)

University Athletic Association (UAA)

Upper Midwest Athletic Conference (UMAC)

USA South Athletic Conference

Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletics Conference

Our 2011 Conference Tournament Central page is tracking the conference tournament results and the awarding of AQ berths here.

At-Large Selection Process

After all the automatic (Pool A) berths have been awarded by the conferences, the men's and women's committees will make their Pool B berth selections followed by their Pool C berth selections.  Teams are selected for Pool B and C at-large berths on a national basis, using regional selection criteria (see section below).  Beyond the selection criteria, note the following principles concerning at-large selections.  

  • To be considered during the at-large selection process (Pool B or C), a team must play at least 50 percent of its competition against Division III in-region opponents.
  • There will be no predetermined regional allocations for Pools B and C.
  • There will be no maximum or minimum number of berths from one region.
  • Institutions participating in conferences that meet the automatic-qualification requirements and are eligible to be selected to a championship via Pool A and/or Pool C, may not elect instead to be selected via Pool B as an independent institution.

At-Large Selection Criteria

The at-large tournament selection criteria are found in Section 2.4 of the Pre-Championship Manual (pgs. 24-25).  The criteria is divided between primary criteria which only consider regional competition and secondary criteria that introduce out-of-region and non-Division III competition, the later only being considered if the former does not enable a distinction to be made between schools.

Primary Criteria (not listed in priority order)

  • Win-loss percentage against regional opponents
  • Strength-of-schedule (only contests versus regional competition)
  • In-region head-to-head competition
  • In-region results versus common regional opponents
  • In-region results versus regionally ranked teams

Secondary Criteria (not listed in priority order)

  • Out-of-region head-to-head competition
  • Overall Division III win-loss percentage
  • Results versus common non Division III opponents
  • Results versus all Division III ranked teams
  • Overall win-loss percentage
  • Results versus all common opponents
  • Overall DIII Strength of Schedule

Regional Rankings Foreshadow At-Large Berths

Regional rankings are done by the same national and regional committees which administrate the championship tournament and make the at-large selections.  The rankings are done by applying the same criteria which is used for making the at-large selections, and are released following the fourth last, third last, and second last weeks prior to the tournament selections being made.  Therefore, by design, these rankings are a direct foreshadowing of the at-large selections providing a certain level of transparency to the at-large selection process and avoiding major surprises when the at-large selections are announced.

As part of the at-large tournament selection process, the committees do final rankings that include the results from the final week prior to the tournament, usually the completion of conference tournaments.  These rankings are not released prior to the announcement of the Pool B and Pool C at-large berths and the tournament brackets.  Two years ago these previously secret final rankings were made available after the fact, but last year they were once again were not. If they are not released or until such time as they are, one can only guess at how the final week's results may have prompted changes in the ranking of teams from the third of the scheduled rankings to selection day.

Strength-of-Schedule

The Strength-of-Schedule used by the Division III soccer committees is based on Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OWP) and Opponents' Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OOWP).  An explanation with an example of these calculations is found in Appendix C (pg. 43) of the Pre-Championship Manual.

Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OWP):

The average of applicable opponents' winning percentages versus D-III competition excluding the results against the team in question.

Opponents' Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OOWP):

The average of the OWP's of all applicable opponents.

Strength-of-Schedule (SOS):

The weighted OWP-OOWP, never specified but deduced to be
2/3 OWP + 1/3 OOWP

Definition of In-Region Competition

The rankings will list each ranked school's in-region and overall record.  Many are initially confused by some of the regional records they see because they somewhat sensibly assume that only opponents from the same region would count towards one's in-region record.  However, page 23 of the Pre-Championship Manual defines in-region competition much more broadly than that.

An opponent is considered in-region if any one of the following criteria is met:

  • within the same defined region
  • within a 200-mile driving radius
  • within the same membership geographical region defined as follows:

Region 1 - Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont

Region 2 - New York, Pennsylvania

Region 3 - Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia

Region 4 - Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming

  • within the same conference (in a conference scheduled match)
    (note: though not specified in the manual, in practice all matches of multi-region conferences have been counted as in-region)

 


Comments or feedback for the author?  Email Christan Shirk.



James Derrick

 

Christan Shirk is a Messiah College graduate (1993, Civil Engineering) and has been a keen and passionate observer of D-III soccer for over a decade.  Never more than a rec-league player himself, Chris brings an analytical approach and nationwide perspective to his writing.  He loves D-III soccer history, statistical number-crunching, and off-the-radar action, all of which he gladly shares with his readers.

Previous
Aug 29: Curtains on three coaching legends
Aug 27: What's new in 2014? - Part 2: Rules Changes
Aug 22: What's new in 2014? - Part 1
Nov 22: Getting to know the 2013 men's Sweet 16
Nov 10: Men's at-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 7: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Oct 23: New criteria debuts in today's NCAA Regional Rankings
Sep 15: Week 3 Flybys, weekend edition
Aug 29: What's new in 2013?
Nov 14: Welcome to the Sweet 16, Part 2: the Men
Nov 13: Welcome to the Sweet 16, Part 1: the Women
Nov 4: At-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 3: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Oct 1: Dear Men's Top 25 Voters
Sep 22: Week 4 Flybys, weekend edition
Sep 21: Week 4 Flybys, midweek edition
Sep 17: Week 3 Flybys
Sep 4: Labor Day Weekend Flybys
Sep 3: New rules, new conference, name changes
Aug 31: 2012 Preseason Flybys (INCOMPLETE)
Nov 14: Hellooooo Neumann!
Nov 13: A Super Saturday to like and dislike
Nov 6: At-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 4: So what's this talk about AQ's, Pool B and Pool C?
Oct 24: Week 8 Flyby Distractions
Oct 19: NCAA Regional Rankings (aka 'The Rankings that Matter')
Oct 17: Week 7 Flybys, Conference Edition
Oct 14: Midseason stars and surprises
Oct 8: Week 6 Flybys, weekend edition
Oct 6: Week 6 Flybys, midweek edition
Oct 1: Week 5 Flybys, weekend edition
Sep 29: Week 5 Flybys, midweek edition
Sep 26: Did you know?
Sep 19: Who's top dog after 3 weeks?
Sep 10: Friday Notes, Weekend Questions
Sep 2: Off with a bang!
Sep 1: Preseason perspectives
Sep 1: After 17 years, trailblazer calls it a day
Dec 4: Inside the women's semifinals
Dec 4: Messiah takes the title in overtime
Dec 3: The stalwart against the upstart
Nov 30: Men's NCAA semifinal preview
Nov 30: Women's NCAA semifinal preview
Nov 21: NCAA men: Welcome to San Antonio!
Nov 21: NCAA women: Sunday's wins are a ticket to Texas
Nov 20: Sweet Saturday: HSU, Oshkosh are on to Texas
Nov 18: NCAA Sweet 16 men's preview
Nov 17: NCAA Sweet 16 women's preview
Nov 7: The AQs are in! Weekend in review
Oct 24: Big weekend for ranked teams
Oct 24: Hardin-Simmons keeps rolling
Oct 17: Did CNU's goal beat the clock?